Print Edition - 2017-02-04 | On Saturday
Making policy, with a dark vision of Islam
- A vision of Islam as inherently hostile has long flourished on the far right. Now Trump and his top aides have pushed it to the centre of American decision-making on security and law
Beyond the restrictions the executive order imposed on refugees and visitors from seven predominantly Muslim countries, it declared that the United States should keep out those with ‘hostile attitudes toward it and its founding principles’
Feb 4, 2017-It was at a campaign rally in August that President Trump most fully unveiled the dark vision of an America under siege by “radical Islam” that is now radically reshaping the policies of the United States.
On a stage lined with American flags in Youngstown, Ohio, Trump, who months before had called for a “total and complete shutdown” of Muslim immigration, argued that the United States faced a threat on par with the greatest evils of the 20th century. The Islamic State was brutalising the Middle East, and Muslim immigrants in the West were killing innocents at nightclubs, offices and churches, he said. Extreme measures were needed.“The hateful ideology of radical Islam,” he told supporters, must not be “allowed to reside or spread within our own communities.”
Trump was echoing a strain of anti-Islamic theorising familiar to anyone who has been immersed in security and counterterrorism debates over the last 20 years. He has embraced a deeply suspicious view of Islam that several of his aides have promoted, notably retired Lt Gen Michael Flynn, now his national security adviser, and Stephen Bannon, the president’s top strategist.
This worldview borrows from the “clash of civilisations” thesis of the political scientist Samuel P Huntington, and combines straightforward warnings about extremist violence with broad-brush critiques of Islam. It sometimes conflates terrorist groups like Al Qaeda and the Islamic State with largely non-violent groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and its offshoots and, at times, with the 1.7 billion Muslims around the world. In its more extreme forms, this view promotes conspiracies about government infiltration and the danger that Shariah, the legal code of Islam, may take over in the United States.
Those espousing such views present Islam as an inherently hostile ideology whose adherents are enemies of Christianity and Judaism and seek to conquer non-believers either by violence or through a sort of stealthy brainwashing.
The executive order on immigration that Trump signed last Friday
might be viewed as the first major victory for this geopolitical school. And a second action, which would designate the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamist political movement in the Middle East, as a terrorist organisation, is now under discussion at the White House, administration officials say.
Beyond the restrictions the order imposed on refugees and visitors from seven predominantly Muslim countries, it declared that the United States should keep out those with “hostile attitudes toward it and its founding principles” and “those who would place violent ideologies over American law,” clearly a reference to Shariah.
Rejected by most serious scholars of religion and shunned by Presidents George W Bush and Barack Obama, this dark view of Islam has nonetheless flourished on the fringes of the American right since before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. With Trump’s election, it has now moved to the centre of American decision-making on security and law, alarming many Muslims.
Trump has insisted that the executive order is not a “Muslim ban,”
and his supporters say it is a sensible precaution to safeguard Americans. Asked about the seeming antipathy
to Islam that appeared to inform
the order, the White House pointed
to Trump’s comments in the
August speech and on another occasion that signaled support for reform-minded Muslims. His
administration, Trump said in August, “will be a friend to all moderate Muslim reformers in the Middle
East, and will amplify their voice.” But critics see the order as a clumsy show of toughness against foreign Muslims to impress Trump’s base, one shaped by advisers with distorted ideas about Islam.
“They’re tapping into the climate of fear and suspicion since 9/11,” said Asma Afsaruddin, a professor of Islamic studies at Indiana University and chairwoman of the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy. “It’s a master narrative that pits the Muslim world against the West,” appealing to Trump supporters who know nothing of Muslims or Islam beyond news reports of terrorist attacks, she said.
The executive order, she said, will backfire by reinforcing the jihadist line that the United States is at war with Islam. “The White House is a huge soapbox,” she said. “The demonisation of Muslims and Islam will become even more widespread.”
Those in the administration with long records of criticizing Islam begin with Bannon and Flynn. Flynn last February tweeted a link to an anti-Muslim video and wrote, “Fear of Muslims is RATIONAL.” In an interview, he said that “Islam is not necessarily a religion but a political system that has a religious doctrine behind it.”
Bannon has spoken passionately about the economic and security dangers of immigration and took the lead role in shaping the immigration order. In a 2014 talk to a meeting at the Vatican, he said the “Judeo-Christian West” is at war with Islam.
“There is a major war brewing, a war that’s already global,” he said. “Every day that we refuse to look at this as what it is, and the scale of it, and really the viciousness of it, will be a day where you will rue that we didn’t act.” Elsewhere, on his radio show for Breitbart News, Bannon said, “Islam is not a religion of peace—Islam is a religion of submission,” and he warned of Muslim influence in Europe: “To be brutally frank, Christianity is dying in Europe and Islam is on the rise.”
Others with similar views of Islam include Sebastian Gorka, who taught at the National Defense University and is a deputy national security adviser. Gorka’s wife, Katharine, who headed think tanks that focused on the dangers of Islam, now works at the Department of Homeland Security. Tera Dahl, who was an aide to former Representative Michele Bachmann, is a National Security Council official. Walid Phares, a Lebanese American Christian who has advised politicians on counterterrorism, advised Trump’s campaign. All four have written for Breitbart News, the right-wing website previously run by Bannon.
They all reflect the hard-line opinions of what some have described as the Islamophobia industry, a network of researchers who have warned for many years of the dangers of Islam and were thrilled by Trump’s election.
They warn about the danger to American freedoms supposedly posed by Islamic law, and have persuaded several state legislatures to prohibit Shariah’s use. It is a claim that draws eye rolls from most Muslims and scholars of Islam, since Muslims make up about 1 percent of the United States population.
“The majority of Muslims don’t interpret the Quran literally,” said Shadi Hamid of the Brookings Institution. “You can have five Muslims who all say we think this is God’s exact words, but they all disagree with each other on what that means in practice.”
Among the most outspoken of those warning about Islam are Pamela Geller, of Stop Islamisation of America, Robert Spencer, of Jihad Watch, and Frank Gaffney Jr, of the Center for Security Policy.
All three were hosted by Bannon on his Breitbart radio program before he became chief executive of the Trump campaign in August. Gaffney appeared at least 34 times. His work has often been cited in speeches by Flynn. Kellyanne Conway, now counselor to Trump, did polling for Gaffney’s center. Last year, the centre gave Senator Jeff Sessions, who has warned of the “totalitarian threat” posed by radical Islam and is Trump’s nominee for attorney general, its annual “Keeper of the Flame” award.
Gaffney has been labeled “one of America’s most notorious Islamophobes” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Anti-Defamation League describes him as a “purveyor of anti-Muslim conspiracy theories.” And even the Conservative Political Action Conference, an annual meeting of right-wing politicians and activists, banned Gaffney temporarily after he accused two of its organisers of being agents of the Muslim Brotherhood.
In an interview, he explained his view of Islam, which focuses less on the violent jihad of Al Qaeda and the Islamic State than on the quieter one he sees everywhere. “They essentially, like termites, hollow out the structure of the civil society and other institutions,” Gaffney said, “for the purpose of creating conditions under which the jihad will succeed.”
The day after the election, Gaffney told the Breitbart radio show how pleased he was with Trump’s win. “It is a great blessing literally from God, but also I think obviously from the candidate himself, Donald Trump,” he said. He praised the “superb people” around Trump, naming Bannon and Flynn, who he said “are actually going to lead us to saving the Republic.”
—©2017 The New York Times
Published: 04-02-2017 08:34