Print Edition - 2014-04-26 | Main News
Parliament passes TRC bill
- Special Court for handling war-era cases
- Govt attorney must file cases forwarded by TRC
Apr 25, 2014-
The endorsement of the bill turns an important page in the seven years of the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) that envisioned a TRC within six months. The bill has undergone some amendments as sought by the Nepali Congress, the CPN-UML and the UCPN (Maoist) parties.
As a result, a special court has been provisioned to deal with conflict related cases. The bill requires the government attorney to file cases forwarded by the TRC. It also mandates reparations for victims or their families as per their priorities.
The bill has “enforced disappearances” instead of “missing persons” in the text but not in the title. The amended law states that if the TRC is to recommend pardon for perpetrators then it has to inquire about the approval or disapproval of victims besides considering the seriousness of the case under discussion. The bill wants the TRC to recommend to the government adequate compensation for properties seized during the conflict. Complaints filed with various state agencies regarding conflict-related incidents will be dealt by the TRC.
“We have addressed the amendment proposals that enrich the content of the bill,” said Law Minister Narahari Acharya who tabled the bill in Parliament. Twenty-six lawmakers had registered their amendment proposals on the bill. But eight from
the UML had withdrawn them on Thursday while nine lawmakers took them back on Friday.
Lawmakers from Madhes-centric and Janajati parties withdrew their proposals after the government pledged to form a separate commission within 60 days to recommend implementation of the accords reached with various armed groups between the signing of the CPA in 2006 and the CA election in 2013.
Addressing Parliament, NC lawmaker Gagan Thapa, who had also filed a joint amendment proposal demanding that any pardoning by victims be an informed decision, remarked that no serious crime should be pardoned. Thapa, however, withdrew his proposal citing the whip issued by his party.
The bill, however, did not witness any change to the reconciliation process to be initiated by the TRC which rights activists say is “forced reconciliation”. The TRC bill had been a major bone of contention as the opposition Maoist party obstructed House proceedings several times demanding that all conflict related cases be dealt by the TRC and that no piecemeal approach be adopted in dealing with such cases.
The bill was brought by the government following the January verdict of the Supreme Court that called for formation of two separate commissions of inquiry. Following the verdict, the government had formed two teams headed by bureaucrats to prepare the draft. It was reviewed by a six-member political team before being tabled in parliament.
Published: 26-04-2014 08:40